Skip to main content

Zero Hour Contracts - Legalised Slavery?

Zero Hour Contracts are the most exploitative practice to ever come about in society. 

You have no say in what hours you work
You work as and when your boss tells you to
You could be days or weeks without an hour of work
Some employers can insist you don't work for anyone else

I don't know about you but I firmly believe this is the closest thing to legalised slavery that society has ever been tricked into accepting.
If you're unemployed and refuse to accept a zero-hour contract you could face losing your benefits, doesn't sound very fair to me. 

How can someone live with that uncertainty, thinking when will I get my next pay check to feed the kids, to pay the electric, to pay the rent. How can a government allow employers to to treat people with such disrespect

SO, I hear that the current government is doing well in reducing the unemployment rate in the country. Maybe this zero-hour contract has something to do with that?

In 2010, when the Conservative led government came into power, their were 168 thousand people in employment on a zero-hours contract. 
The most recent figures from June 2014 state that their were 622 thousand people in employment on one of these contracts. That's and increase of over 450 thousand people under the leadership of this conservative led government. Now comparing June to August with March to May, the number of people in employment increased by 46 thousand. I wonder how many of these people were forced to accept a zero-hours contract?

It's nice to know what this government is relying on to fix the economy - I hope that action will be taken to tackle this problem. Options:

  • Abolish Zero Hour Contract

These contracts may be the best thing that every happened to businesses, but its the worst thing that has every happened to employees. This is not a representation of the fair Britain that I grew up to know. Plus, the figures might look good now but in a few more months their will be a black hole in the budget and these contracts could very well have a a part to play in that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Food Banks - The rising popularity

2010 – 2011 61,468 2013 – 2014 913,138 You’re looking at these figures and thinking what on earth is he on about, these are the number of people who received three days’ e mergency food from Trussell Trust foodbanks – Figures compare 2010-2011/2013-2014. Wow. That’s an increase of about 850 thousand people, of those 330 thousand are children . One question you have to ask yourself is what has caused these people to require food hand outs in order to feed themselves and their children when so many of us do not. 47% of these people relied on foodbanks because of benefit delays or changes, that’s almost 430 thousand people . This figure is quite interesting and says something about the current government, here are some of the things from the welfare budget that the current conservative led government have cut, which has led to this: ·          Child Trust Fund abolished – Families made £675 worse off per year. ·          Education Maintenance Allowa

Apprenticeships - Unfair and exploitative? Cheap Labour?

In the 2009/10  year 279 thousand people started an apprenticeship.  Year 2012/13 and  510 thousand people started an apprenticeship .  My opinion - the conservative led government have ranked up efforts to get the unemployed on an apprenticeship to help with those unemployment figures! Apprenticeships are normally aimed at 16-18 year old school leavers who want to train and work whilst getting paid at the same time.  The National Minimum Wage for an apprentice aged 16-18 is £2.73 per hour . The pay is quite low, if you work full-time then you'll get around £95 per week , but that's not bad (or is it) for someone of that age who probably has nothing to pay out for.  And if I were 16 again I probably would have done an apprenticeship  rather than go to college and get paid nothing.  45% of the 510 thousand people  that started an apprenticeship in 2012/1013 were  25 years of age or older  compared to  18% in 2009/2010 . That's qui